Brand or generic names (Dilaudid finds hydromorphone); misspellings are corrected.

Filters and sort 2 active

The number beside each option is how many cases you get if you pick it, given everything else already selected.

Case / When Where Setting Drug Method Role Prosecution status Penalty Source
CVS Agrees to Pay $315M Over Unlawfully Filled Opioid Prescriptions and False Claims
2026-10-13
Rhode Island
Rhode Island
CVS Pharmacy Inc. and related corporate entities, pharmacy chain based in Rhode Island; complaint filed Dec. 13, 2024 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island Opioids and other controlled substances, including "trinity" prescriptions (an opioid, a benzodiazepine and a muscle relaxant) Alleged: filled prescriptions that lacked a legitimate medical purpose or were not issued in the usual course of professional practice (dangerous and excessive opioid quantities, early fills, pill-mill prescribers) despite red flags, then billed many to federal healthcare programs not stated Civil settlement announced Oct. 13, 2026: $315 million, plus a memorandum of agreement with DEA requiring a reporting hotline for employees and the public, proactive monitoring of pharmacy dispensing patterns, and a process to evaluate suspected prescribers. Whistleblower Hillary Estright's share not yet determined (U.S. ex rel. Estright v. CVS Health Corp., No. 22-cv-00222, D.R.I.) $315,000,000 (civil settlement) source
Macomb County Physician and Pharmacy Owner Pay $700,948 Over Opioid Prescribing and Filling Scheme
2024-11-04
Michigan
Clinton Township, Michigan
Medical practice and an on-site pharmacy (Heartland Drugs) sharing an office complex in Clinton Township, Michigan Opioid and ADHD (stimulant) medications Physician prescribed medically unnecessary opioid and ADHD medications, which the co-located pharmacy filled without adequate scrutiny not stated Physician, his practice, and the pharmacy owner paid $700,948.42 to settle False Claims Act allegations, November 2024; physician surrendered his DEA registration $700,948 (civil settlement) source
Barbourville Pharmacy Pays $215,000 Over Red-Flag Prescription Failures
2024-05-09
Kentucky
Barbourville, Kentucky
Smith Family Pharmacy, a retail pharmacy in Barbourville, Kentucky Oxycodone and oxymorphone Pharmacy filled over 500 prescriptions bearing red flags for diversion or abuse — dangerous drug combinations, high dosages, and out-of-state prescribers — without resolving the concerns not stated Pharmacy and pharmacist-in-charge paid $215,000 civil penalty and signed a four-year DEA Memorandum of Agreement, May 2024 $215,000 (civil penalty) source
Cumberland, Maryland Pharmacy Reaches Consent Decree Over Fraudulent Opioid Prescriptions
2023-07-06
Maryland
Cumberland, Maryland
Retail pharmacy Oxycodone and other opioids, often combined with benzodiazepines, carisoprodol, or buprenorphine Filled fraudulent, high-MME prescriptions and dangerous drug combinations while ignoring documented red flags not stated Consent decree approved — $120,000 civil penalty plus mandatory red-flag protocol (July 2023) $120,000 (civil settlement) source
Montgomery County Pharmacy Reaches Consent Decree Over Fraudulent Opioid Dispensing
2023-05-31
Maryland
Germantown, Maryland
Retail pharmacy Opioids dispensed concurrently with stimulants Filled fraudulent prescriptions for out-of-area patients and high-MME, cash-paid combinations while ignoring red flags not stated Consent decree approved — $100,000 civil penalty; pharmacist license surrendered (May 2023) $100,000 (civil penalty) source
Baltimore Pharmacy and Pharmacist Settle Red-Flag Dispensing Allegations
2022-05-12
Maryland
Baltimore, Maryland
Independent retail pharmacy (Ultra Care Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland) Controlled-substance prescriptions (opioids) Filled facially fraudulent prescriptions for multiple unrelated people presented together, ignoring cross-gender OB/GYN prescribing and identical-quantity red flags not stated Consent decree approved; $15,000 civil penalty and corrective red-flag procedures required $15,000 (civil penalty) source
Wisconsin Pharmacy Settles Controlled Substance Dispensing and Recordkeeping Violations
2022-04-29
Wisconsin
Cadott, Wisconsin
Cadott Miller Pharmacy, retail pharmacy (Cadott, WI) Controlled substances — high-risk drug combinations dispensed 2017-2019 Filled drug combinations with no legitimate medical purpose, filled prescriptions with no valid Rx on file, allowed unauthorized early refills, dispensed Schedule II drugs for opioid dependence not stated DEA immediate suspension order Dec 17, 2019; pharmacy surrendered DEA registration Jan 7, 2020; civil settlement $20,000 — announced Apr 2022 $20,000 (civil settlement) source
Aspirar Pharmacy Pays $100K for Filling Invalid Opioid Prescriptions
2022-02-03
North Carolina
Cary / Durham, North Carolina
Aspirar Pharmacy, two locations (Cary/Durham, NC) Controlled substances — invalid prescriptions filled 2017-2018 Filled prescriptions from Dr. Sharon Halliday, who wrote them outside the scope permitted by her Duke University faculty limited license, without confirming her license's validity not stated Civil settlement, $100,000 + DEA memorandum of agreement to stop filling for the practice — announced Feb 3, 2022 $100,000 (civil settlement) source

Every filtered view has its own URL, so it can be linked or bookmarked. The same filters work on the JSON feed: /api/cases.json.

What each column does and doesn't cover

Every case states When (date) and Where (state) — 730 of 730. Beyond that, a blank cell means the source record does not state that fact, not that it did not happen:

  • Setting: stated in 649 of 730 cases (89%)
  • Drug: stated in 657 of 730 cases (90%)
  • Method: stated in 474 of 730 cases (65%)
  • Prosecution status: stated in 474 of 730 cases (65%); a documented penalty (fine, settlement, or restitution) exists for 77 of 730 cases (11%)
  • Role: stated in only 255 of 730 cases (35%) — filtering or sorting by role silently hides the rest of the registry, which may still describe the same role in prose without a structured field

Disclaimer

Case summaries are based on public records (DOJ press releases, court documents, news reports). Charges are allegations unless a conviction is noted. Analysis is educational, not legal advice.

Share: LinkedIn X Facebook

Last reviewed: September 2026 · Content is educational, not legal advice.